POULTRY FACT SHEET NO. 16c
COOPERATIVE EXTENSION
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
September 1997
CALIFORNIA TURKEY PRODUCTION
John C. Voris Extension Turkey Specialist University of California, Avian Sciences Department Kearney Agricultural Center, 9240 S. Riverbend Ave., Parlier, CA 93648
Turkey
Production and Consumption
Turkey production in the United
States for 1995 was 296 million. The number one production state was North Carolina
with production of 63 million and Minnesota was second with production of 41.0
million. In November of 1991, one of the four large California integrators,
announced they would discontinue their California operation by May 22, 1992.
They did close out their feed mill, processing plant a and left 28 turkey production
facilities empty. With this change in the numbers
of turkeys produced, California's national rank slipped to fourth and the number
produced dropped from 29 million to 24 million for 1992 and bottomed out at
21 million in 1994. California's production was up slightly in 1995 to 21.5
million and we expect it to rise in 1996 to about 23 million. We are just beginning
to come out of the slump caused by the withdrawal of one large integrator.
Table 1. Leading Turkey
Production States (millions)
States
|
1985
|
1990
|
1991
|
1993
|
1994
|
1995
|
1996*
|
North Carolina |
31.9
|
58.0
|
58.0
|
61.0
|
60.0
|
63.0
|
59.5
|
Minnesota |
30.4
|
46.3
|
44.0
|
42.0
|
41.5
|
41.0
|
43.0
|
Arkansas |
---
|
22.0
|
24.0
|
25.0
|
24.0
|
25.0
|
27.0
|
Virginia |
---
|
---
|
---
|
21.0
|
22.0
|
24.0
|
25.0
|
California |
20.5
|
32.0
|
29.0
|
22.5
|
21.5
|
21.5
|
22.5
|
U. S. Total |
185
|
283
|
285
|
288
|
290
|
293 |
301 |
*estimated
|
The 1990 national per capita
consumption of turkey was 19.3 pounds. Our national consumption figures were
revised downward to make poultry consumption figures more nearly match beef
figures by taking the bone out of poultry. Therefore
the 1990 figure is now 17.6 pounds per capita. In 1996 the per capita consumption
was 18.5 pounds.
The per capita consumption
in California is greater than the national average and is estimated to be about
2-3 pounds more than the national per capita consumption. We do not have a true
figure for California with the complication of accounting for the turkey shipped
in and out of the state. The major reason given for this difference in consumption
for California over the national consumption is the greater use of the barbecue
in California. Turkey consumption has been increasing steadily in recent years.
Table 2. Per Capita Consumption of Turkey, Beef and Chicken
|
1985
|
1990
|
1993
|
1994
|
1995
|
1996
|
1997*
|
U. S. Turkey |
11.6 |
17.6 |
18.6 |
18.0 |
18.5 |
18.5 |
18.7 |
Calif. Turkey* |
16.6 |
19.6 |
19.7 |
19.8 |
20.1 |
20.5 |
20.5 |
Beef |
67.8 |
66.8 |
67.5 |
68.1 |
67.5 |
67.7 |
66.7 |
U.S. Chicken |
61.5 |
64.0 |
71.5 |
73.0 |
68.8 |
70.8 |
72.3 |
*estimated
|
Structure of the California Turkey Industry
The turkey industry in California
is almost completely integrated. Nearly all turkeys are grown under contract
with one of four large integrated companies or their subsidiaries. These large
integrated companies have all or part of the following enterprises related to
turkey production: Breeders, hatchery, feed mill, processing plant, further
processing plant (if separate), company owned growing facilities, contract growing
facilities and turkey live haul.
When the original announcement was made by a large turkey company to discontinue
California production, the company promised to help as many of their producers
as possible to find a new contract. They hoped the whole integrated company
could be sold or transferred so that the schedule of their growers would not
be interrupted. They promised to intercede for their growers and find contracts
either with another turkey integrator or with major broiler integrators.
In November 1992, a year after the announcement of closure, the 24 displaced
growing facilities are aligned as follows: Ten are now converted and/or converting
to chickens. Six of those facilities were able to find contracts with other
turkey integrators. Four of the facilities are empty, and three are contracted
to a new processor. One growout facility is being converted to a breeder facility.
Geographically, the California turkey industry is divided with the bulk of the
breeders both primary and multiplier located in the cooler coastal areas and
the majority of the meat production located in the San Joaquin Valley. The principal
counties for meat production are Stanislaus, Merced, Madera, Fresno, Kings and
Tulare. Until recently meat production was moving further South with the largest
concentration located South of Fresno. A new turkey processing plant and two
new feed mills have been constructed in this area. The reason for the move is
largely pressure from urbanization. Within the last year, the new processing
plant and one of the feed mills were closed.
California has traditionally been a center for primary breeding. The largest
primary breeder, Nicholas Turkey Breeding Farms, Inc. has its headquarters in
Sonoma, California. A smaller primary breeder, the Orlopp Turkey Farms,
Inc is located near Orosi, California. Nicholas once accounted for about 80%
of the breeding stock used in the United States. They are now responsible for
about 50%. The other 50% is divided between Hybrid Turkeys Inc., Ontario, Canada
and British United Turkeys of America, Lewisburg, West Virginia and Orlopp Turkey Farms, Orosi, California.
|